BLN RSS

More Blacklisted News Blacklisted Newsletter Blacklisted Radio
On Twitter
On Youtube
On Roku
On Facebook
Podcasts on Demand
Podcasts on Spreaker
Podcasts on iTunes
Podcasts on Stitcher
Podcasts on Tunein Radio



Donate Today

Affiliates
6 Dollar T-Shirts
Nuvona Premium Foods GoldSilver.com
The Ready Store
Onnit Labs
Audible Audio Books
Amazon.com
Bulletproof Coffee
Blue Host

Blog Roll
What Really Happened
Cryptogon
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Full Specturm Dominance
Information Liberation
VICE
Cryptome
All Gov.
Michael Snyder
Tony Cartalucci
VoltaireNet
The New American
Raw Story
Truth Dig
Antiwar
Drudge Report
Breitbart
The Peoples Voice
Real News Network
Alternet
Information Clearing House
VOA News
Truth Out
Common Dreams
No Agenda News
Aangirfan
Old Thinker News
Activist Post
Dark Politricks
SGT Report
Andrew Gavin Marshall
Tom Burghardt
Dana Gabriel
Jacob Hornberger
Media Monarchy
Truth Is Treason
Reason
Lew Rockwell
Strike The Root
10th Amendment Center
Globalist Report
Survive Change
Explosive Reports
Vigilant Citizen
Red Ice
Wayne Madsen
WhoWhatWhy
Silent Crow
Wtfrly
From The Trenches
WhoWhatWhy
Liberty Garage
Boing Boing
Freedom Outpost
Resist Radio
Wide Awake News
News Blok 2
Against The Wall
End The Lie
Disinformation
SHTF Plan
ITHP
The Excavator
Open Secrets
Project Censored
Business / Economics
Gold and Metals Prices
Coin Values
Zero Hedge
Testosterone Pit
Washingtons's Blog
Of Two Minds
Money News
Max Keiser
Naked Capitalism
Sovereign Man
Business Insider
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Market Oracle
Money Morning
My Budget 360
Alt-Market
Shadow Stats
Azizonomics
Economist
Economy Watch
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Daily Crux
The Daily Economist
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Faux Capitalist
Daily Bail
Hang The Bankers
Against Crony Capitalism
Economic Policy Journal
Gonzalo Lira
Liberty Blitzkrieg
The Burning Platform
The Daily Bell
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Strat Risks
Oil Price
Phantom Report
Global Research
Foreign Policy Journal
Global Post
Intel News
1913 Intel
F. William Engdahl
Rick Rozoff
Corbett Report
Public Intelligence
Boiling Frog Post
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Strategy Page
Homeland Sec. Newswire Science / Tech News
Tech Dirt
Ars Technica
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Tech Eye
Engadget
New Scientist
DVice
Mother Board
EFF
Technovelgy
Next Big Future
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
Health & Environment
Prevent Disease
Food Freedom
Farm Wars
Medical Express
Natural Society
Waking Times
Natural News
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Magazines
The Atlantic
Salon
Slate
Time











A New Great Game in Central Asia?

November 13, 2012

Source: WUPR

Post image for A New Great Game in Central Asia?

Is there a new “Great Game” springing into existence in Central Asia? Many pundits and journalists who write on the region and its global importance argue that there is. In fact, after the Cold War and the birth of the five republics of Central Asia, this debate has dominated much of the analysis of the region.

Captain Arthur Conolly, a British officer of the Sixth Bengal Native Light Cavalry, coined the concept of the ‘Great Game’ in the 1830’s. Later, the English writer Rudyard Kipling immortalized the concept in his 1901 novel Kim. In basic terms, the Great Game was simply a struggle for power, territorial control, and political dominance between the Russian and British Empires in Central Asia in the nineteenth century. This competition of maneuvering and intrigue between the two empires came to an end in 1907, when both nations were forced to focus their resources on more serious threats. The British had to gear up and contain the rise of an assertive Germany in Europe, and the Russians were locked in a fierce struggle with the Japanese in Manchuria.

 

Today, the US invasion of Afghanistan and opening of military bases in Central Asia and the economic expansion of China into the region have convinced experts that a new Great Game is afoot. German journalist Lutz Kleveman writes that a new Great Game “rages in the region.” Quoting Bill Richardson, former Secretary of Energy and US ambassador to the United Nations during the Clinton years, Kleveman writes that the US is involved in Central Asia not only to defeat al Qaeda but also to “diversify [its] sources of oil and gas [and to] prevent strategic inroads by those who don’t share [its] values.” Niklas Swanstrom, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, reaches the same conclusion, and in China and Central Asia: a new Great Game or traditional vassal relations? , heargues that the U.S. and China are enmeshed in a geo-economic competition over Central Asia’s natural resources. He says, “[t]he situation in Central Asia seems to be developing into a new version of the Great Game.”

Contrary to conventional wisdom, China’s objective in Central Asia is not to engage in a game with other regional powers but to secure “regional states’ support in suppressing anti-Beijing Uighur nationalists,” and to pave the way for Chinese firms to invest in Central Asian energy resources. Central Asian states are endowed with oil and natural gas supplies, and China, as a rising economic power and the second largest consumer of energy, has a clear interest in increasing its presence in the region. China’s efforts to build roads and improve infrastructure and railways indicate the country’s growing involvement in Central Asia. As China’s relationship with Central Asian republics grow, “its relationship with major powers, namely the US and Russia, might suffer,” argues Kevin Sheives, a scholar on the region.

It is premature for China to go about implementing such a strategy. At present, China is faced with many domestic challenges. For example, it has to deal with Tibet, Xinjiang, and other semi-autonomous regions, all with separatist inclinations and ambitions for independence. China’s top priorities in Central Asia should be establishing security, maintaining regional stability, suppressing Uighur separatists in Xinjiang, and strengthening economic ties in region.

In order to satisfy the needs of its 1.4 billion people, China must search continuously for resources throughout the world. Chinese corporations and government-owned companies are involved in the economic affairs of the five republics of Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, which possess abundant supplies of natural gas and oil. Given China’s security concerns and energy needs, its engagement with Central Asian states will dramatically expand over the long term. Central Asian states are also welcoming China’s increasing expansion as they try to break Russia’s monopoly over transport routes. Ever since the foundation of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2001, China has been working to construct a new Silk Road to integrate Central Asia and the rest of the world with Xinjiang, an autonomous region in northwest China. The Middle Kingdom’s return to Central Asia is likely to reconfigure the geopolitics of the region—hopefully for the better.