BLN RSS





Enter your email address:

News, Blogs,
Information, and Analysis

What Really Happened
Information Liberation
Cryptogon
Strat Risks
Raw Story
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Full Specturm Dominance
Information Clearing House
Boiling Frog Post
Global Research
The Peoples Voice
Tom Burghardt
Michael Snyder
Tony Cartalucci
Madison Ruppert
Steve Quayle
Wayne Madsen
Uncover The News
All Gov.
Media Monarchy
Andrew Gavin Marshall
F. William Engdahl
Cryptome
Corbett Report
Common Dreams
Alternet
Antiwar
VICE
Aftermath News
Truth Out
Lew Rockwell
Dissident Voice
Sovereign Independent
Before It's News
News With Views
Jeff Rense
Strike The Root
Old Thinker News
Deadline
Activist Post
No Agenda News
Empire Burlesque
CNS News
Dark Politricks
Stop The Lie
Amy de Miceli
Rumor Mill News
The Resident
Aangirfan
OpEDNews
The Brad Blog
Conspiracy Archive
Foreign Policy Journal
Counter Punch
A Little Rebellion
Truth Dig
Truth Is Treason
Reason
Real News Network
VOA News
Huffington Post
Grist
World Net Daily
Drudge Report
Salon
Reality Sandwich
MikesNewsNet
Red Ice
Newsmax
Boing Boing
Short News
Counter PsyOps
Small Government Times
The Blotch
Wide Awake News
News Blok 2
Against The Wall
Disinformation
Vigilant Citizen
Amped Status
Federal Jack
SHTF Plan
ITHP
The Daily Bell
The Excavator
Phantom Report
NewsWires
Breaking News
Yahoo News
Google News
Community News Aggregators
Reddit
Digg
Business / Economics
Silver and Gold Prices
Max Keiser
Naked Capitalism
Business Insider
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Market Oracle
Money Morning
My Budget 360
Alt-Market
The Street
Shadow Stats
Economist
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Daily Crux
Stock Charts
Zero Hedge
Washingtons's Blog
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Oil Price
Global Post
Public Intelligence
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Silo Breaker
Strategy Page
Homeland Sec. Newswire
Health & Environment
Natural News
Prevent Disease
Food Freedom
Farm Wars
Medial Express
Natural Society
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Science / Tech News
Tech Dirt
Ars Technica
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Tech Eye
Engadget
New Scientist
DVice
Mother Board
Technovelgy
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World




Security System

Donate Today









Bill Clears Path For 30,000 Surveillance Drones Over US In Next Ten Years

February 9, 2012

Source: ACLU

Congress is poised to give final passage to legislation that would give a big boost to domestic unmanned aerial surveillance — aka “drones.”

As we explained in our recent report, drone technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, and there is a lot of pent-up demand for them within the law enforcement community. But, domestic deployment of unmanned aircraft for surveillance purposes has largely been blocked so far by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which is rightly concerned about the safety effects of filling our skies with flying robots (which crash significantly more often than manned aircraft).

As we also explained in our report, the FAA is under pressure to loosen the reins and permit broader deployment of drones by government agencies.

One result of that pressure is this legislation (H.R. 658 — see conference report for more details), which authorizes appropriations for the FAA through fiscal 2014. Unfortunately, nothing in the bill would address the very serious privacy issues raised by drone aircraft. This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected.

Congress — and to the extent possible, the FAA — need to impose some rules (such as those we proposed in our report) to protect Americans’ privacy from the inevitable invasions that this technology will otherwise lead to. We don’t want to wonder, every time we step out our front door, whether some eye in the sky is watching our every move.

On Friday, the House gave final passage to the legislation. House approval came on a quite partisan vote, with most Republicans in favor and most Democrats opposing. The Senate is scheduled to take up the bill later today.

Here are details on what the bill would do in terms of drones:

  • Require the FAA to simplify and speed up the process by which it issues permission to government agencies to operate drones. It must do this within 90 days. The FAA has already been working on a set of proposed regulations to loosen the rules around drones, reportedly set for release in the spring of 2012.
  • Require the FAA to allow “a government public safety agency” to operate any drone weighing 4.4 pounds or less as long as certain conditions are met (within line of sight, during the day, below 400 feet in altitude, and only in safe categories of airspace).
  • Require the FAA to establish a pilot project within six months to create six test zones for integrating drones “into the national airspace system.”
  • Require the FAA to create a comprehensive plan “to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.” “Civil” drones means those operated by the private sector; currently it is all but impossible for any non-government entity, except for hobbyists, to get permission to fly drones (for-profit use of drones is banned). Industry groups and their congressional supporters see this as a potential area for growth. Congress specifies that the plan must provide for the integration of drones into the national airspace system “as soon as practicable, but not later than September 30, 2015.” The FAA has nine months to create the plan. The FAA is also required to create a “5-year roadmap for the introduction” of civil drones into the national airspace.
  • Require the FAA to publish a final rule within 18 months after the comprehensive plan is submitted, “that will allow” civil operation of small (under 55 pounds) drones in the national airspace, and a proposed rule for carrying out the comprehensive plan.

The bottom line is: domestic drones are potentially extremely powerful surveillance tools, and that power — like all government power — needs to be subject to checks and balances. We hope that Congress will carefully consider the privacy implications that this technology can lead to.

Learn more about surveillance: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.