BLN RSS

More Blacklisted News Blacklisted Newsletter Blacklisted Radio
On Twitter
On Youtube
On Roku
On Facebook
Podcasts on Demand
Podcasts on Spreaker
Podcasts on iTunes
Podcasts on Stitcher
Podcasts on Tunein Radio



Donate Today

Affiliates
6 Dollar T-Shirts
Nuvona Premium Foods GoldSilver.com
The Ready Store
Onnit Labs
Audible Audio Books
Amazon.com
Bulletproof Coffee
Blue Host

Blog Roll
What Really Happened
Cryptogon
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Full Specturm Dominance
Information Liberation
VICE
Cryptome
All Gov.
Michael Snyder
Tony Cartalucci
VoltaireNet
The New American
Raw Story
Truth Dig
Antiwar
Drudge Report
Breitbart
The Peoples Voice
Real News Network
Alternet
Information Clearing House
VOA News
Truth Out
Common Dreams
No Agenda News
Aangirfan
Old Thinker News
Activist Post
Dark Politricks
SGT Report
Andrew Gavin Marshall
Tom Burghardt
Dana Gabriel
Jacob Hornberger
Media Monarchy
Truth Is Treason
Reason
Lew Rockwell
Strike The Root
10th Amendment Center
Globalist Report
Aftermath News
Survive Change
Explosive Reports
Vigilant Citizen
Red Ice
Wayne Madsen
WhoWhatWhy
Silent Crow
Wtfrly
From The Trenches
WhoWhatWhy
Liberty Garage
Boing Boing
Freedom Outpost
Resist Radio
Wide Awake News
News Blok 2
Against The Wall
End The Lie
Disinformation
SHTF Plan
ITHP
The Excavator
Open Secrets
Project Censored
Business / Economics
Gold and Metals Prices
Coin Values
Zero Hedge
Testosterone Pit
Washingtons's Blog
Of Two Minds
Money News
Max Keiser
Naked Capitalism
Sovereign Man
Business Insider
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Market Oracle
Money Morning
My Budget 360
Alt-Market
Shadow Stats
Azizonomics
Economist
Economy Watch
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Daily Crux
The Daily Economist
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Faux Capitalist
Daily Bail
Hang The Bankers
Against Crony Capitalism
Economic Policy Journal
Gonzalo Lira
Liberty Blitzkrieg
The Burning Platform
The Daily Bell
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Strat Risks
Oil Price
Phantom Report
Global Research
Foreign Policy Journal
Global Post
Intel News
1913 Intel
F. William Engdahl
Rick Rozoff
Corbett Report
Public Intelligence
Boiling Frog Post
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Strategy Page
Homeland Sec. Newswire Science / Tech News
Tech Dirt
Ars Technica
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Tech Eye
Engadget
New Scientist
DVice
Mother Board
EFF
Technovelgy
Next Big Future
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
Health & Environment
Prevent Disease
Food Freedom
Farm Wars
Medical Express
Natural Society
Waking Times
Natural News
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Magazines
The Atlantic
Salon
Slate
Time











Pentagon Declares Failed Afghanistan Surge a Success…by Redefining its Goal after the Fact

October 1, 2012

Source: ALL Gov.

After eleven years of war in Afghanistan, which have left 15,322 Americans wounded and 2,126 dead, the Pentagon appears ready to take the advice given by Senator George Aiken (R-Vermont) in 1966 regarding the failing war in Vietnam: unilaterally declare victory and go home. To make such a declaration even marginally credible, however, the military has first determined to “move the goalposts” by redefining the goals of the war after the fact.

 

That the war in Afghanistan, including the “troop surge” ordered by President Obama in 2009, has been a failure is clear from a recent report released by the NATO Afghanistan military command. For example, in July 2009, just a few months before the surge, insurgent attacks totaled about 2,000, while in July 2012 they attacked about 3,000 times, an increase of about 33%. (Because the precise number of attacks remains classified, precise statistical analysis is impossible.) The same is true for every month in 2009 compared to every month in 2012 for which data exists: The insurgency launched more attacks in 2012 than it did in 2009. The conclusion is inescapable: the troop surge has done nothing to degrade the insurgents’ military strength or capabilities.

And that was the purpose of the troop surge, as President Obama explained in a speech at West Point in December 2009 announcing his decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan: “We must reverse the Taliban’s momentum and deny it the ability to overthrow the government.”

Because that goal has not been met, as the surge winds down the military has discovered another, more limited goal that it believes it can claim to have achieved. Two weeks ago, General Martin E. Dempsey, who is Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, contended that the intended purpose of the surge was “to buy us some time to push back on some Taliban initiatives—particularly in the south and southwest—and to buy us some space to grow the Afghan security forces.”

While it is true that Afghan security forces have grown by about 50,000 during the surge period, it is also true that attacks by members of those forces on American and allied forces have also grown. With the troop surge ending October 1, and the U.S. committed to withdrawing all forces by the end of 2014, declaring victory and going home seems the most rational course of action, particularly as two-thirds of Americans want U.S. troops to return as soon as possible.

- Matt Bewig

 To Learn More:

Pentagon Invents New Goal for Afghan Surge Now That It’s Done (by Spencer Ackerman, Wired)

Military’s Own Report Card Gives Afghan Surge an F (by Spencer Ackerman, Wired)

ISAF Monthly Data Trends through August 2012 (NATO Afghanistan Command) (pdf)