Add to Google




http://www.wikio.com

BLN RSS



Twitter



Alternative News,
Information, and Analysis

Rogue Government
What Really Happened
Cryptogon
Raw Story
Citizens for Legit Gov.
Information Clearing House
American Free Press
Global Research
The Peoples Voice
Tom Burghardt
Uncover The News
All Gov.
Media Monarchy
Information Liberation
TPM Muckraker
F. William Engdahl
Cryptome
Narco News
Media Matters
Uruknet
Corbett Report
Common Dreams
Alternet
Antiwar
Aftermath News
Steve Quayle
Wayne Madsen
Truth Out
Etherzone
Online Journal
Lew Rockwell
Dissident Voice
News With Views
Jeff Rense
Strike The Root
Peter Chamberlin
Dprogram
12160
Old Thinker News
Common Dreams
Empire Burlesque
American Exile
CNS News
IntelliBreifs
Electric Politics
Stop The Lie
Amy de Miceli
Crooks and Liars
Rumor Mill News
The Resident
Aangirfan
OpEDNews
The Brad Blog
Conspiracy Archive
Foreign Policy Journal
Counter Punch
August Review
Buzzflash
Truth Is Treason
NewsWires
News Now
My Way News
Reuters Alert Net
1st Headlines
Yahoo News
Ananova
Excite AP
Knight Ridder
Newsday AP
Google News
Swiss Info
ABC Wire
News Interactive
US Newswire
World News Network
United Press Int.
Associated Press
Excite News
MSN News
PR Newswire
Reuters
Scripps Howard
Xinhua
ZD Net
Community News Aggregators
Reddit
Digg
Online Only
Natural News
Real News Network
VOA News
Huffington Post
World Net Daily
Drudge Report
Newsmax
Boing Boing
Short News
Small Government Times
Capitol Hill Blue
Global Post
Business / Economics
Seeking Alpha
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Funny Money Report
Market Oracle
Money Morning
The Street
Shadow Stats
Economist
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Kitco
Gold Eagle
Max Keiser
321 Gold
Stock Charts
Zero Hedge
Washingtons's Blog
The Daily Reckoning
Energy Business Review
Milplex / Intel / Defense
Danger Room
Washington Technology
Defense Industry Daily
Global Security
Geopolitical Monitor
Defense Link
Stratfor
Space War
Jane's
Defense Tech
Strategy Page
Military Info Tech
Major US Newspapers
New York Times
New York Post
New York Daily News
Washington Post
Washington Times
L.A. Times
USA Today
Science / Tech News
Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Engadget
New Scientist
Technovelgy
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
VNU Net
Satire & Animation
Onion YouTube
Reptile God
Wahoos Mopar Grave Yard
Royal Canadian Air Farce
The Daily Show
The Colbert Report
Mark Fiore
All Hat No Cattle
Mack White
Propaganda Remix Project
Internet Weekly Report
Kontraband
Holy Lemon


oracle broadcasting

Kristos Trading





AddThis Feed Button
FKN NEWZ Texas Team Speak
Add to Technorati Favorites
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional






World At War

U.S. Air-Sea Battle Plan in Strategy Review Over Perceived China, Iran Threats
Published on 02-01-2010Email To Friend    Print Version
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Source: Bloomberg

The U.S. military is drawing up a new air-sea battle plan in response to threats such as China’s persistent military build-up and Iran’s possession of advanced weapons, according to the Pentagon’s latest strategy review.

The Air Force and Navy are seeking more effective ways of ensuring continued access to the western Pacific and countering potential threats to American bases and personnel, according to the Quadrennial Defense Review to be released later today.

The joint Air Force-Navy plan would combine the strengths of each service to conduct long-range strikes that could utilize a new generation of bombers, a new cruise missile and drones launched from aircraft carriers. The Navy also is increasing funding to develop an unmanned underwater vehicle, according to the report.

The battle plan is among a range of new initiatives outlined in the review, which is conducted every four years to revise U.S. military strategy for the coming decade or more. The new report places top priority on the fights in Afghanistan and Iraq and against terrorist threats elsewhere, while also preparing for future threats.

“This is truly a wartime QDR,” Defense Secretary Robert Gates wrote in a cover letter for the report. “For the first time, it places the current conflicts at the top of our budgeting, policy and program priorities.”

Two-War Capability

The review deemphasizes but does not abandon the Pentagon’s doctrine that calls for the military to be able to fight two major wars nearly simultaneously. It acknowledges this mission but says planning should focus more closely on other scenarios, such as irregular warfare including conflicts involving insurgents or drug traffickers and even humanitarian disasters.

“In the mid- to long-term, U.S. military forces must plan and prepare to prevail in a broad range of operations that may occur in multiple theaters in overlapping time frames,” the Defense Department says in the review.

“This includes maintaining the ability to prevail against two capable nation-state aggressors,” it states.

Alluding to China in his cover letter, Gates cites longer- term threats such as “the military modernization programs of other countries.” He also hints at dangers such as al-Qaeda in referring to “non-state groups developing more cunning and destructive means to attack the United States and our allies and partners.”

Tensions With China

U.S. officials have often called on their Chinese counterparts to provide explanations and assurances that their moves are purely defensive. The two countries resumed military talks last June, then China halted visits again over the Defense Department’s Jan. 29 announcement of a new arms sale to Taiwan.

China is developing and deploying “large numbers” of advanced missiles, new attack submarines, long-range air defense systems and capabilities to wage electronic warfare and target computer systems, according to the report, which echoes an assessment of China’s military power issued almost a year ago.

China’s refusal to provide adequate assurances of its intentions raises “a number of legitimate questions regarding its long-term intentions,” the Pentagon says in the review.

Citing “more complex” security conditions in the region, including North Korea and terrorist threats in Southeast Asia, the review calls for “a more widely distributed” and flexible U.S. presence in Asia that relies more on allies. Partners would include Australia, Thailand, the Philippines, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam.

Threat From Iran

In the Middle East, Iran is fielding small attack boats in the Persian Gulf, a development that U.S. officials have cited in the past. That compounds the threat to naval operations from the acquisition by Iran and other nations of weapons such as quiet submarines and advanced cruise missiles that can target ships, according to the report.

Iran also has provided drones and shoulder-fired missiles to the Islamic militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Russia and other nations have contributed to the spread of surface-to- air missiles, the department said.

Among the solutions proposed are more ways to deploy U.S. forces abroad, such as naval assets, “in regions facing new challenges.” Existing bases also need to be either hardened to protect against potential attacks or reinforced with back-up locations or by dispersing them in multiple places, the department concluded.

The Pentagon has about 400,000 U.S. military personnel stationed overseas, either in war zones or elsewhere. The review emphasizes “taking care of our people” serving in multiple long deployments that take a “significant toll” on them and their families.

Other Concerns

In addition to supporting existing wars, the Quadrennial review emphasizes the need for more unmanned aircraft, intelligence, special forces, helicopters and long-range strike capabilities as well as skills such as foreign languages and training of foreign military forces.

The U.S. military, especially the Navy and Air Force, also should find better and faster ways to strengthen the defense systems of foreign allies and partners as needed, the Pentagon said.

The Pentagon should continue to maintain a nuclear arsenal as a “core mission” until “such time as the administration’s goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is achieved,” according to the report.

The potential threat of cyber attacks and the need to conduct “high-tempo operations” will require more expertise in that field and centralized command of cyber operations, the department said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Tony Capaccio in Washington at acapaccio@bloomberg.net; Viola Gienger in New Delhi via vgienger@bloomberg.net.