Not that the public would know anything about it — or the dangerously loose oversight involved. And that’s by design.
The Trump administration is not only expanding the use of drones, it is also obscuring the facts about how many drones are being used, how many people are being killed by them, and where.
“Think back when the US pursued the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Troops weren’t allowed to engage, but there was no prohibition on drones. The same thing is happening in Niger, even before the recent attacks on US troops stationed there.”
“The government has all but officially suppressed information coming out about US policy concerning drone warfare,” Nick Mottern, veteran reporter and founder of the anti-drone activist site KnowDrones, told WhoWhatWhy.
Journalists and academics we spoke with for this article agree that information about the frequency, location and impact of drone strikes is being obfuscated.
When the Obama administration wanted to discuss drones, said Mottern, it used “publicity” (like press conferences) to provide information on attacks — even if the numbers later proved to be inaccurate.
Perhaps as a result, while Obama’s extensive drone program invited much criticism from left-leaning and mainstream publications during the last year of his presidency, Trump’s actions have garnered much less attention. However, activists such as Mottern have learned how to look for clues in places where the relevant information cannot easily be hidden.
“We can tell by examining defense budgets that increased funding is being poured into the drone program,” he said. “This is also obvious from blogs tracking drones leaving bases in Italy, Djibouti, and likely another in Africa.”
Sarah Kreps, author of Drones: What We Need to Know and an associate professor of government at Cornell University, agreed that information concerning the US drone war has become “murkier” and that “more drone strikes” are probably occurring.
“Drone warfare was already secretive … Now it’s almost impossible to follow under Trump. One thing we do know is that, along with Trump’s loosening engagement rules, the CIA wants to expand their program into Afghanistan, where already American advisers and Afghan military are going around effectively as ‘death squads’ to kill insurgents.”
Kreps points out that the Trump administration is “combining drone strikes” with airstrikes, making the information “less clear cut.”
Evidence of this “murky” distinction is reflected in a Bureau of Investigative Journalism article titled “Fewer Strikes — But More Bombs Hit Afghanistan.”
Based on available data published by US Air Forces Central Command (AFCENT), the article demonstrates how investigative journalists use military publications to dig for the truth about current drone policy — even though it puts them at the mercy of often obscured military information.
For example, AFCENT published data that said a total of a 751 weapons — bombs, missiles and rounds fired by jets, drones and gunships — were released in the air war over Afghanistan in September 2017. Then the Air Force issued a correction: only 414 weapons had been released. The official explanation for the discrepancy left reporters scratching their heads, and with no way to verify the actual count.
“One of the advantages to drone use is that the US doesn’t even require a physical footprint,” drone expert Hugh Gusterson — an international affairs professor at George Washington University — told WhoWhatWhy. “Think back when the US pursued the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Troops weren’t allowed to engage, but there was no prohibition on drones. The same thing is happening in Niger, even before the recent attacks on US troops stationed there.”
Maj. Jeremy Fields, chief of standard evaluations with the 6th Reconnaissance Squadron, pilots an MQ-1 Predator during a training mission. Photo credit: US Air Force
The US military presence in Africa has slowly been increasing, under the banner of fighting terror groups like al-Qaeda-aligned al-Shabaab and ISIS-affiliated Boko Haram. One only has to look at the growing drone program, and recent reports revealing 6,000 US troops stationed in Africa — a number far greater than even hawkish members of Congress, like Sens John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), understood had been dispatched under the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF).
The Trump administration conducted its first drone attack in Somalia, on November 9, against al-Shabaab militants. Gusterson fears that this development, which he had predicted in an earlier interview with WhoWhatWhy, may herald a major military escalation by US forces.
“Drone warfare was already secretive … Now it’s almost impossible to follow under Trump,” said Gusterson, the author of Drones: Remote Control Warfare. “One thing we do know is that, along with Trump’s loosening engagement rules, the CIA wants to expand their program into Afghanistan, where already American advisers and Afghan military are going around effectively as ‘death squads’ to kill insurgents.”
The Trump administration seems intent on obscuring its growing use of drone strikes in several countries. WhoWhatWhywill continue to follow this story as it develops.
Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhowhatWhy from drone (US Air Force)
Our IP Address: