This will be one of the most important posts I have ever made.
So, as to provide the reader with the most clear, unbiased, and objective information, I will refrain from presenting personal opinions and instead lay bare the facts so that that you can decide for yourself upon the validity and cruciality of the matter at hand.
I have decided to structure this post as follows:
We all know that this global pandemic has had devastating consequences for everyone around the globe - not only in terms of related deaths, but significantly in terms of economic devastation and the ability for people to go to work, lead "normal" lives, travel freely, enjoy the company of their friends and family, and so on.
While this pandemic has been largely reported by the mainstream media as one of the worst ever, the reality is not the case at all as the Spanish Flu had killed a significantly larger portion of the world's population back a century ago in 1918-1919.
In fact, at that time the world's population was around 1/7th of what it is today (around 1 billion) and an estimated 40-50 million people died back then compared to about 2.2. million from today.
Image source: Visual Capitalist - Visualizing the History of Pandemics
Back then, the various governments and health authorities did not "shut down" everything as they have done in 2020 and in 2021 thus far.
And the additional health and economic consequences of those over-reaching decisions have additionally compounded the suffering of the masses in terms of cancelled surgeries and medical procedures, suicides, business closures, bankruptcies, increased unemployment, travel restrictions, and so on.
One can easily ask: has the cure been worse than the disease?
Before addressing this question, I would first like to outline the correct terminology that we should use. Covid-19 refers to the disease one may develop due to catching SARS-COV-2 which is the name of the virus which is one type of coronavirus.
According to the WHO (World Health Organization):
Vaccines work by training and preparing the body’s natural defences --- the immune system--- to recognize and fight off the viruses and bacteria they target. If the body is exposed to those disease-causing germs later, the body is immediately ready to destroy them, preventing illness.
Other basic information about the Covid-19 vaccine can be found from the following sources:
Unfortunately, while these organizations might appear as reputable ones and are the ones various governments and health authorities around the world refer to with regards to their health policies and procedures, I have extensively demonstrated in a previous exposé how corrupt they have been with regards to previous egregious doings and highly unethical and profiteering practices with Big Pharma. In that exposé, I have clearly outlined and extensively enumerated how the WHO, the FDA and CDC have on multiple occasions breached their duty in protecting the interests of patients. Rather, they have been highly influenced and coerced by Big Pharma interests.
Even the very "reputable" Mayo Clinic, as referenced above appears to have its own deficiencies, shortcomings, and questionable practices. All you need to do is watch the video they have on the page referenced above; listen to it and you will see for yourself how the person in the video is speaking outright lies (that the Covid-19 vaccine is very safe) that do not align at all with the facts presented in this paper and by other government agencies (specfically, VAERS).
For decades, scientists have been trying to develop a vaccine to counter coronaviruses, but for the most part have been unsuccessful.
Normal vaccine development time can take up to 10-15 years (or more) to complete. source]
While the process of vaccine development along with its related standards, regulation, and oversight can vary from country to country, generally speaking, they occur in progressive stages and phases (source: The History of Vaccines - Vaccine Development, Testing, and Regulation):
The first steps usually involve testing in a laboratory setting and on animals (Exploratory Stage - usually lasting 2-4 years + Pre-Clinical Stage - cell-culture systems and animal testing to assess the safety of the candidate vaccine and its immunogenicity, or ability to provoke an immune response)
Phase I Vaccine Trials - on humans - to assess the safety of the candidate vaccine and to determine the type and extent of immune response that the vaccine provokes.
Phase II Vaccine Trials - on humans - to study the candidate vaccine’s safety, immunogenicity, proposed doses, schedule of immunizations, and method of delivery
Phase III Vaccine Trials - on humans - assess vaccine safety in a large group of people (among other things)
Phase IV Trials - optional studies that drug companies may conduct after a vaccine is released. The manufacturer may continue to test the vaccine for safety, efficacy, and other potential uses.
Evaluation of Vaccine Safety & VAERS (in the US) - The CDC and FDA established The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in 1990. The goal of VAERS, according to the CDC, is “to detect possible signals of adverse events associated with vaccines.” (A signal in this case is evidence of a possible adverse event that emerges in the data collected.) About 30,000 events are reported each year to VAERS. Between 10% and 15% of these reports describe serious medical events that result in hospitalization, life-threatening illness, disability, or death.
A little bit more on VAERS:
VAERS is a voluntary reporting system. Anyone, such as a parent, a health care provider, or friend of the patient, who suspects an association between a vaccination and an adverse event may report that event and information about it to VAERS. The CDC then investigates the event and tries to find out whether the adverse event was in fact caused by the vaccination.
The CDC states that they monitor VAERS data to
While at one point there were nearly 100 candidates for the vaccine development, some major players have been in the running to this potentially highly-lucrative endeavour (i.e., as various governments around the world have committed to buying millions of doses).
Such major players include Pfizer & BioNTech (working collaboratively on a highly experimental mRNA vaccine), Moderna (RNA-based vaccine),AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, among many others.
While these pharmaceutical giants have been working on various forms of Covid-19 vaccines since mid-2020, some have already been deployed en masse on humans in various countries - to devastating effects I must add.
These Covid-19 vaccines have been developed in less than 7 months - something which is grossly rushed and not in-line with usual and standard practices (as was clearly delineated above).
Some or several of the usual steps, stages, and phases have been bypassed and we are seeing the results of these negligent actions in the number of reported cases (excluding unreported cases, of course) of adverse reactions and deaths related to the administration of these rushed, inadequately tested, and experimental vaccines.
Let us now have a look at the ugly numbers - at least for those that have been reported.
VAERS, or 'Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System', was described in the previous section as an important means to have a centralized location to report adverse effects and deaths related to the administration of a particular vaccine.
While VAERS appears to be mostly for the United States, it can still give us an important insight as to the risks involved with these new Covid-19 vaccines.
So what are the numbers?
You can download the lastest full report from VAERS official website at: https://vaers.hhs.gov/eSubDownload/index.jsp?fn=2020VAERSVAX.csv.
Note that the exact date on which this file has been compiled is not specified, as it does not appear on their website, nor in the actual file; but it is safe to assume it was prepared last year (perhaps in December, not sure), as "2020" figures in the name of the file. In other words, these figures don't include any cases from 2021.
If you open the file in Microsoft Excel, you will see 52,935 rows of data (note that I have downloaded the file on February 6, 2021) each of which represents some kind of adverse effect or death. While not all of these are directly from a "COVID19" (VAX_TYPE as they state in Column B), you can easily count them; I've done a quick count and the number of entries with "COVID19" stand at a whopping 25,155 cases (nearly half of all entries).
25,155 is an astounding figure given that it only comprises a few months of data from the period from which said Covid-19 vaccines have been deployed; and keep in mind that these are reported cases for the United States only.
A significant portion of these are from PFIZER/BIONTECH2 and MODERNA.
Moreover, from what I referenced above - namely, that the CDC and FDA who had established The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System noted that usually "about 30,000 events are reported each year to VAERS".
Let's do the math.
Nearly 84% (25155 / of what would usually be around 30000 total yearly cases) of the cases are COVID19 related! And this is probably only for 2-3 months of 2020 since the vaccines were deployed after September/October of 2020.
If you don't want to go through the details of the file itself, you can watch the following video that very briefly summarizes its contents:
VIDEO: VAERS - Pfizer and Moderna adverse reaction reports escalating at an alarming rate... (URL: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/vaers-pfizer-and-moderna-adverse-reaction-reports-escalating-at-a-alarming-rate_sMrmjQBfKOwHvYM.html)
It's doesn't take a genius to figure out that these figures are highly indicative of a systemic disaster in the rushed deployment of these highly experimental vaccines.
Despite this, governments and health authorities around the world continue to administer them on their population bases, seemingly regardless of these ill effects and reported deaths.
Even a significant portion of doctors and nurses have shown their reluctance to both take and administer these highly questionable vaccines in their respective practices and jurisdictions.
While there are too many references of medical doctors, researchers, medical practitioners, and nurses who are opposed to the deployment and administration of these rushed vaccines, I will nonetheless mention one in particular so that the reader can get an intimate perspective of those who have been asked to deliver these dangerous and toxic doses to patients. These doctors have very reputable credentials and come from all over the world.
A few highlights [emphasis added]:
Over 100,000 doctors and various health professionals have now united against the government planned genocide, with the pharmaceutical giants ready to start the slaughter in the long term care homes via an untested vaccine that purposely skipped animal trials.
The uninformed public is also targeted first and foremost, simply believing the government would never lie to them. The government is more than lying and these health professionals go on the record to document the government and media lies.
As the vaccine is set to kill and cripple the seniors and the uninformed in the first wave of genocide, their vaccine induced deaths and disease states will be used as the excuse to force the vaccine on everyone else, as the evil media and corrupt government will simply re-label the medical genocide as COVID-19 or something more deadly than COVID.
There is no pandemic, the governments are faking the death counts (simply placing all deaths in the fabricated COVID category), all the governments are using a fraudulent RT-PCR machine to mark healthy people as infected (therefore driving a fear based case-demic of people who aren’t ill) plus the vaccine is designed to kill, cripple and/or cause infertility.
While a lot in the text above might appear, at prima facie, as conjecture, the fact remains that there is a lot of truth to what he is saying, as has been clearly demonstrated by official government data in the previous section.
Furthermore, the other doctors state many other under-reported facts that are negligently left out by the mainstream media outlets.
You can also watch the following related video in which Dr. Kaufman and many other doctors from around the world state what reality they are seeing and experiencing in their own jurisdictions:
ADDENDUM (added 2021-02-08):
It has recently come to my attention that America's Frontline Doctors has recently published a White Paper On Experimental Vaccines For COVID-19 (click for PDF, or download it from here) along with an online petition STOP MEDICAL DISCRIMINATION - The Petition To Stop Forced Experimental Vaccines (https://stopmedicaldiscrimination.org/) which has already amassed 456,895 signatures.
One of those doctors is Dr. Simone Gold, a Board-certified Emergency physician, and she recently (January 24, 2021) explained the problems with these experimental vaccines; you can watch the video, titled The Truth About Covid-19 and The Covid-19 Vaccine. hereunder:
In case YouTube deletes the above video, you can view it from Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gN7DeGRiZiFR/ .
Here is the Table of Contents of the aforementioned America’s Frontline Doctors White Paper On Experimental Vaccines For COVID-19 along with some highlights from its 34-page contents:
Highlights [emphasis added]:
This document represents the preliminary findings of an investigation conducted by the member-physicians of America's Frontline Doctors.
We are recommending caution for patients and policy makers and employers. Additional transparency and more research are needed before we ask Americans to embark on the largest experimental medical program in US history. The unknowns must be addressed through a scientifically rigorous process.
Mandates for experimental medical therapies are neither permissible nor advisable. Ordinary Americans should not be compelled to sign up for a "vaccine passport" or similar mandate just to travel on an airplane or see a concert with friends. The potential for third-party abuse of private health information and real medical risk to individuals remains much too high. Concentrations of private power pose a threat to privacy and other civil liberties and policy makers must proceed with caution.
from the Frequently Asked Questions section:
Is AFLDS suggesting that the COVID vaccine is unsafe?
No. We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication. In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease, the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened. More studies of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy should be conducted and published, and more transparency about possible risks provided to the public before Americans enter the largest experimental medication program in our history.
from the II. COVID-19 Medical Myths: Low Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) section:
The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19 is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:
- COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile
- COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children
- COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable
Let the reader note that the source of these figures is none other than the United States CDC (Center for Disease Control).
from the III. COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines Trials section:
Vaccines against COVID-19 are now being approved for experimental use. This will be the shortest time scientists have ever been able to develop a new vaccination for a major disease. It not only typically takes years to create a new vaccination, but very often, despite the best efforts of scientists, a successful vaccine proves impossible. For example, scientists (including Dr. Fauci) tried to create an HIV vaccine for more than forty years.
The technology used for the first COVID-19 vaccinations being brought to market by Pfizer and Moderna uses an “mRNA” or “messenger RNA” technique. The COVID-19 virus is an RNA virus, meaning that the viral genetic code is carried in the virus’ ribonucleic acid or RNA. The messenger RNA is the instruction manual that cells use to manufacture proteins. The mRNA vaccine instructs human cells to manufacture a specific COVID-like protein. This protein, once formed, then stimulates our immune system to produce an antibody to fight against this COVID-19-like protein. The hope is that the antibody would be ready to attack the real virus should it be encountered “in the wild.”
This is the first time that an mRNA mechanism is being used in a vaccination. For the most part, mRNA technology is used in cancer therapy. It has had some success in producing various proteins to attack and disrupt certain cancer cells. Most of the commentary so far suggests that it may not be too much of a leap to use this approach in a vaccination therapy.
The AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination uses a different mechanism. It takes an adenovirus that has been modified to include genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 virus so that it introduces the immune system to the spike protein of the COVID-19 virus.
The three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines nearest to FDA public distribution are two mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, and one viral vector vaccine developed by AstraZeneca.
from the IV. COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines Controversies: section:
Scientists have the same concerns for the experimental vaccines as for all drugs. Is the proposed treatment safe and is it effective.
1. Brand New Technology.
No vaccine based on messenger RNA has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies.
2. Failure of Previous Coronavirus Vaccines.
Despite trying for decades, scientists have never been able to create a successful coronavirus vaccine. Whenever they think they have, the experimental coronavirus vaccine has failed and animals who got the experimental vaccine died.
3. No Independently Published Animal Studies.
Most other previous vaccines have performed and published results on animal studies prior to giving to humans. This is critical because deadly effects are often not seen until this step.
4. Known Complications.
*(refer to the whitepaper for a full list)
5. Unknown Complications.
*(refer to the whitepaper for a full list)
6. Pharmaceuticals are Immune from All Liability.
The same companies (and executives) that profit from this vaccine are immune from all liability. In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). It provides immunity from liability to all vaccine manufacturing companies. With COVID-19 experimental vaccine, AstraZeneca goes even further in acknowledging that this is an emergency situation and requested no liability from the EU.
7. An Experimental Vaccine Is Not Safer Than a Very Low IFR.
The IFR was always known to be very low for the young and healthy middle aged, and it has now been shown to be extraordinarily low. We are getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.
In the Questions Regarding the Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines section we find:
1. No Proof the Vaccine Stops Transmission of the Virus.
The trial data on the vaccinations released so far has not addressed the issue of transmission of the virus. That is, the efficacy data is primarily based on symptoms, not on transmission.
I invite the reader to have a look at the entirety of the paper to get a full balanced perspective on these doctors' professional assessment.
As per a January 3, 2021 article entitled WHO, Fauci Warn COVID-19 Vaccines May Not Prevent Infection and Disease Transmission, even the WHO chief scientist warns that the Covid-19 may not prevent infection and disease transmission
At a virtual press conference held by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Dec. 28, 2020, WHO officials warned there is no guarantee that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent people from being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and transmitting it to other people.
One has to immediately ask: then what exactly is the purpose of the Covid-19 vaccine?
It seems that all we have been hearing from governments and health authorities for the past year is the need to prevent further spreading of the virus. Although many [questionable and harsh] measures have been taken for this, they have all been aggressively pushing for a vaccine that would serve as an ultimate backstop.
Yet, if these Covid-19 vaccines neither prevent the infection nor stop the spread of the disease, then what function are they serving (apart from big profits - in the $billions - for Big Pharma)?
Any inquisitive mind would be asking this critical question.
Here are some links to some articles about this should you wish to read more:
The Vaccine Reaction - WHO, Fauci Warn COVID-19 Vaccines May Not Prevent Infection and Disease Transmission, January 3, 2021
The National Post (Canada) - WHO chief scientist not confident vaccines prevent transmission
The Burning Platform - WHO Chief Scientist Warns “No Evidence COVID Vaccine Prevents Viral Transmission”
From a now deleted Tweet (video still viewable):
Once again, while there are so many instances of articles that have documented the countless cases of adverse effects and deaths - particularly among seniors and in nursing homes - here are some to give you a [bitter] taste of the sheer ugliness of what these toxic injections are providing to an all-too-trusting and vulnerable public. In each, you can read about the relevant details and specific adverse reactions and circumstances surrounding such instances. On occasion, I will include some excerpts/quotes from the original articles.
ZeroHedge - Norwegian Nursing Home Patients Dead After Receiving First Dose Of Pfizer COVID Vaccine, Jan 07, 2021
ZeroHedge - Rate Of Adverse Reactions To COVID Vaccines Already 50x Higher Than Flu Shot, Jan 05, 2021
ZeroHedge - 100s Of Israelis Infected With COVID After Receiving Pfizer Vaccine Amid Frenzied Inoculation Campaign, Jan 02, 2021
"I’m choosing the risk — the risk of having COVID, or the risk of the unknown of the vaccine," said 31-year-old nurse April Lu of the Providence Holy Cross Medical Center in Los Angeles, who added that she refused to take the vaccine because she wasn't convinced of its safety for pregnant woman. Lu is six months pregnant.
"I think I’m choosing the risk of COVID. I can control that and prevent it a little by wearing masks, although not 100% for sure," she added. Lu isn't alone, with several of her co-workers similarly refusing to take the vaccine.
Another healthcare worker, office assistant Nicholas Ruiz at Natividad Medical Center in Salinas, California says that while he interacts with nurses who deal with COVID-19 patients, he's not taking the vaccine either.
Read the rest of the report here.
ZeroHedge - Swiss Patient Dies Shortly After Receiving Pfizer COVID Vaccine, Dec 31, 2020
ZeroHedge - WHO Chief Scientist Warns "No Evidence COVID Vaccine Prevents Viral Transmission" , Dec 29, 2020
The comments were made by WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan during what appears to have been a virtual press conference held Monday:
"I don't believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it's going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on”, says WHO Chief Scientist
Of course, a close look at the research released by Pfizer and Moderna shows the studies haven't actually tested whether the vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus; the goal of the trials was to see whether vaccinated patients presented with COVID symptoms at a rate that was substantially less frequent than individuals who hadn't been vaccinated.
ZeroHedge - FDA Says 2 Participants In Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Have Died, Dec 08, 2020
ZeroHedge - FDA Confirms Pfizer Vaccine 95% Effective, Warns Of 'Severe Adverse Reactions' After Dose 2, Dec 08, 2020
ZeroHedge - Chief Medical Officer Says Canadians Who Refuse Vaccine Won't Have "Freedom To Move Around", Dec. 05, 2020
Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer says that those who refuse to take the COVID vaccine won’t have “freedom to move around” and will have to continue to wear masks.
Dr. David Williams was asked if he “would make some sort of mandatory vaccination recommendation.”
Williams acknowledged that “we can’t force someone to take a vaccine,” but when on to explain how people who didn’t take it would have their freedom of mobility severely restricted. “What we can do is to say sometimes for access or ease of getting into certain settings, if you don’t have vaccination then you’re not allowed into that setting without other protection materials,” said Williams.
“What may be mandatory is proof of…vaccination in order to have latitude and freedom to move around…without wearing other types of personal protective equipment,” he added.
If bars, restaurants, cinemas, sports venues, airlines, employers and others all make the vaccination a mandatory condition of service, anyone who refuses to take it will be reduced to a personal form of de facto lockdown with their social lives and mobility completely stunted.
In a previous post from six months ago, I expressed concern about what the Canadian government were planning with regards to a potential mandatory vaccination program following the Pfizer and Moderna's contract with them in this regard. In that piece, I reference a CCTV article 'Feds strike deal with pharmaceutical firms for millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccine' for which I highlighted the following:
...in which was stated by Canadian Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains the following troubling words:
"Until we immunize all Canadians, we must also focus on producing treatments for those who contract the virus,"
Both Bains and Anand said they will be working closely with Health Minister Patty Hajdu and Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam on a vaccine rollout plan, which will include decision-making on whether to make vaccination mandatory or voluntary. [a reference to what Minister Bains said along with Mrs. Anand, the Minister of Public Services and Procurement].
To say that Canadian health authorities are considering making these dangerous Covid-19 vaccines upon 33 million Canadians is not only careless, but worrisome to say the least.
Strategika (in French) - Le patron de Pfizer fête Hanoukka après avoir reçu le feu vert final pour distribuer son vaccin contre le coronavirus à travers les États-Unis, [Pfizer boss celebrates Hanukkah after receiving final green light to distribute coronavirus vaccine across United States] Dec 22, 2020 - Google translated (from French)
Alt-Market - Is The Globalist "Reset" Failing? The Elites May Have Overplayed Their Hand, Dec 10, 2020
Why should we ask 99.7% of Americans or the world to accept medical tyranny just to make .26% of the population feel safe?
The vaccine rush and the claims of effectiveness of 94% to 95% from Pfizer and Moderna are suspect. The average effectiveness of most vaccines is around 50% or less, and these are vaccines with hundreds of trials and years of usage. Somehow, Pfizer and Moderna were both able to produce a vaccine for a SARS type virus when multiple governments tried for over a decade to produce vaccines for SARS in China and were unsuccessful, and they were able to achieve 95% effectiveness?
The elites know that a third of Americans (and probably Europeans) will not take the vaccine regardless of any propaganda they dish out. They also know that 60% of Americans are unlikely to take the vaccine unless they can show an effectiveness rate of at least 75%. Neither Moderna nor Pfizer have actually produced any evidence that their vaccines are capable of prevented severe illness or death from Covid, so, their effectiveness rate is based on “projections” of success according to their minimal trials. Meaning, the effectiveness rate of 95% is completely arbitrary.
The public is right to be suspicious. A former Pfizer vice president, Dr. Michael Yeadon among other medical professionals have recently warned that the vaccines have not been adequately tested and that there is a risk of “indefinite infertility” for women who take the current Covid vaccine due to damaging autoimmune response. In other words, the vaccine could make many women barren and unable to have children.
As you can see in the passage above, even a former Pfizer vice-president has warned that these vaccines have not been adequately tested and pose a risk of infertility for women.
ChildrensHealthDefense - COVID Vaccine Hesitancy Widespread, Even Among Medical Professionals, Nov 25, 2020
ChildrensHealthDefense - Leading COVID Vaccine Candidates Plagued by Safety Concerns, Nov 13, 2020
Finally, it must also be noted that these pharmaceutical companies enjoy immunity from legal prosecution and financial damages resulting from the ill-effects and deaths of those (or the family members of those) who have suffered from their vaccines. This is the case in the United States, as I have documented in my post on Big Pharma; excerpt follows:
Vaccine Makers Enjoy Total Immunity from Prosecution in the United States
Source: Cornell Law 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Standards of responsibility
With the complicit assistance of a very corrupt US Congress, Big Pharma enjoys total immunity from prosecution since the passing of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which completely shields them from liability when their vaccines cause injury or death of innocent babies and children – the most vulnerable members of society.
While I don't have the complete information handy, it is my understanding that many of the G20 countries have offered similar immunity from prosecution to these pharmaceutical giants with regards to the Covid-19 as well, as I have read several pieces to this effect (but unfortunately cannot currently locate them); feel free to refute this in the comments section below if you have information that confirms the contrary.
As various governments and health authorities keep pushing the illusion that Covid-19 vaccines are safe and that everyone should get them, and, while the mainstream media outlets refuse to do any real investigative or objective reporting on the matter, we, as people who are rightfully concerned with our health, should take our own precautions with regards to this virus.
Moreover, we need to keep an eye on our respective legislators to see if they are being aggressively lobbied by large pharmaceutical firms who are pushing for the sale and administration of hundreds of millions of doses of their experimental, obviously dangerous and unproven Covid-19 vaccines.
As I succinctly outlined in a previous post about Covid-19 Vaccination Status Passports, legally, no country nor its health authorities has any legal right to force-vaccinate us. Specifically in that article, I stated the following:
Here's where the law is on your side though:
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights from the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (URL: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx) clearly states in Article 7:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49, source: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
As no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation, this clearly outlines your rights not to be forced to take a vaccination - certainly not an experimental one which many from Pfizer, Moderna, and others actually are - against your will.
And any person or entity enforcing this upon you would be in direct violation of this legal right and could thus be subject to legal action and possibly prosecuted.
If you want to make sure that your country adheres to this covenant by the United Nations, you can consult the official list of 173 countries that have legalized this covenant in their own legislatures. (See Wikipedia - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - Parties to the Covenant, URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Civil_and_Political_Rights#Parties_to_the_Covenant)
Even though we are legally protected under the law, sadly some governments and health authorities - particularly those ill-informed and subservient idiots who enforce their rules and illegal mandates - may still try to impose their medical tyranny upon the sanctity of your body and sovereignty.
In such cases, you still have another means by which you can, at least partially, protect yourself.
Our IP Address: